Broker comparisons · custody first
Compare brokers for a mandate desk
Tier A scorecards with use-case guidance, regulation diligence and honest fee uncertainty — not invented pip tables or fake awards. Capital stays with the broker you choose; Kodiac is the mandate layer.
No universal “#1 broker” rankings. Capital at risk.
Diligence
Trust signals
- Operated by Kodiac Capital Limited (Dubai company registration (filing in progress)) — see Trust Center.
- Broker pages describe connectivity to Kodiac desks; funds stay at your broker.
- No invented licences, awards, or guaranteed returns.
Diligence
How we test brokers
- Confirm the broker appears in the Kodiac MT5 directory and connectivity docs.
- Check public entity / platform claims against primary sources — never invent licences.
- Score only when evidence exists; otherwise leave cells pending.
- Disclose that Kodiac is not the broker and does not custody broker balances.
Tier A comparisons
- Exness vs IC MarketsUpdated 2026-07-24
No single winner. Pick Exness if funding familiarity and operational speed in your region matter most. Pick IC Markets if you already optimise around raw/ECN-style MT5 cost structure and are comfortable with that onboarding path. On Kodiac, both keep funds at the broker.
- Exness vs VantageUpdated 2026-07-24
No blanket winner. Exness often edges familiarity and funding discussions in several retail markets. Vantage is a strong alternative when it is the broker you can actually open and fund. For Kodiac, both are Tier-A MT5 paths with non-custody balances.
- FP Markets vs PepperstoneUpdated 2026-07-24
These brands compete in the same “pro retail MT5” lane. Choose by entity availability, account type economics you can verify live, and which onboarding completes without friction. Kodiac treats both as Tier-A desk brokers.
- Exness vs XMUpdated 2026-07-24
No universal winner. Exness often wins when funding familiarity and operational speed in your corridor matter most. XM can win when XM onboarding/promotions (read terms) and MT5 access are clearer for you. On Kodiac, both keep funds at the broker.
- OANDA vs IGUpdated 2026-07-24
No blanket winner. Both are brand-led brokers with multi-entity footprints. Pick the one that offers a supported MT5 path and clean funding in your residency, then connect that single broker of record to Kodiac.
How we compare
Shared dimensions across every seeded pair. Cells favour diligence language over fake precision. Full methodology sits on each comparison page. Custody and pricing stay with the broker; we score mandate-desk fit — not which broker “wins” for everyone.
- Regulation & entity clarity
- Platforms (MT5)
- Spreads & typical cost profile
- Funding & withdrawals
- Instruments & markets
- Support & onboarding
- Kodiac mandate-desk fit
Tier A broker reviews
Registry size: 5 seeded compare URLs (no mass generation). Also see connectivity and academy.
Tools: Position Size Calculator · Pip Value Calculator · Gain / Loss Calculator
Diligence
Affiliate & commercial disclosure
Kodiac Capital provides mandate design, desk execution and oversight. We are not the broker named on this page, do not custody client broker balances, and may earn fees when you use Kodiac products. Broker terms, spreads, and availability are set by the broker — verify on the broker’s official site.
Diligence
Risk disclosure
Trading Forex and CFDs involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Capital is at risk.
Choose a broker, then add the mandate layer
Capital stays with your broker. Kodiac adds mandate design, desk execution and oversight.
Request access